From: "Per Jessen" <p...@computer.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 2009/November/25 03:03
Hajdú Zoltán wrote:
LuKreme írta:
On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
wrote:
I'm not saying that companies registered in habeas do not spam.
I'm saying that those who do should be reported, which could make
habeas worth using.
Ah, well that's a whole other issue. Habeas is a commercial
enterprise and I don't work for them, so reporting their abusive
customers isn't my job.
Then whos job? :) Habeas doesnt monitor Your Inbox.
It can only be Habeas' job to police their own customers. It's in their
own interest. How else can they retain any trustworthiness?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Having a little help might help them maintain a better product.
But (that bitter word), the basic concept is broken. If the spammer
can make more money than it costs to get on the Habeas whitelist
then they will pull the same trick I've seen here in California in the
construction trades. A business owner creates a new business,
incorporates it, accepts a job, and when the job goes sour bankrupt
and fold the shell corporation. The same trick is available for the
HABEAS spoof. Hence, I figure the concept is unworkable on its
face.
{^_^}
