Alvaro,
sorry I was not clear before. The directory and the folder structure was
there(lot of 2 digits folders). I could not find messages there. Anyway, I
know now that would solve nothing. I expect to see some like the smsc
folders inside /etc/kannel/store, so maybe I could just move the files
around (BTW, this would not make think far simplier?)
Since this cannot be done, I could not fix that anyway...
Kannel is up and running...
Dino
If it is correclty set, you should see under your spool path a series
of folder named 01, 02, 03.... and inside of them you should find
files with their names like the kannel message ID.
You can try this to verify kannel can write to that directory:
Stop kannel. when kannel has no messages in queue
delete all folders under your spool dir (/etc/kannel/store)
restart kannel and send messages
Kannel will start creating folders and write into them the queued messages.
Hope helps
Regards
Alvaro
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com
2009/8/20 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> The store mechanism is independent of any smsc, common for all of them and
> kannel will panic if it is not accesible.
> Kannel backs up its message Q in the store-location you specify. Therefore
> the mechanism you ask is already in place.
>
> Have you checked in the store-location for any messages during normal
> operation? Have you used the admin interface to view the Q contents?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dino Sane Moreira"
<[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message
>
>
>> Donald,
>>
>> I use "smsc = smpp" and "smsc = at". It happens with any of them,
although
>> more with modems.
>>
>> Alvaro,
>> I have configurated this:
>>
>> store-type = spool
>> store-location = /etc/kannel/store
>>
>> any ideas about?
>>
>> Thanks for promptly reply !
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Mensagem original-----
>> De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Em
>> nome de [email protected]
>> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 20 de agosto de 2009 13:00
>> Para: [email protected]
>> Assunto: users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 48
>>
>> Send users mailing list submissions to
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> [email protected]
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> [email protected]
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Basic queue management - loss of message (Dino Sane Moreira)
>> 2. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Donald Jackson)
>> 3. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Donald Jackson)
>> 4. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Alvaro Cornejo)
>> 5. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Alvaro Cornejo)
>> 6. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Nikos Balkanas)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:13:49 -0300
>> From: "Dino Sane Moreira" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Basic queue management - loss of message
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch
>> or
>> new version fixing this absolutely basic issue:
>>
>> If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
>>
>> So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending
>> process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see
>> that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that
>> specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done?
>>
>> Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to
>> use
>> Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far
>> bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of
them
>> freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to
>> the
>> others?
>>
>> For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when
stop/restart
>> a
>> gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Dino
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:44:16 +0200
>> From: Donald Jackson <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message
>> To: Users mailing list <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> What kind of SMSCs are you using?
>> I noticed that there is some inconsistency with regards to this behaviour
>> between different SMSC types.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>>
>> 2009/8/20 Dino Sane Moreira <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a
patch
>>> or
>>> new version fixing this absolutely basic issue:
>>>
>>> If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
>>>
>>> So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending
>>> process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see
>>> that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that
>>> specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done?
>>>
>>> Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to
>>
>> use
>>>
>>> Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far
>>> bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of
>>> them
>>> freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to
>>
>> the
>>>
>>> others?
>>>
>>> For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when
>>> stop/restart
>>> a
>>> gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Dino
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Donald Jackson
>> http://www.ddj.co.za/
>> donaldjster(a)gmail.com
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>>
<http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090820/279e6667/attachm
>> ent-0002.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:44:16 +0200
>> From: Donald Jackson <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message
>> To: Users mailing list <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> What kind of SMSCs are you using?
>> I noticed that there is some inconsistency with regards to this behaviour
>> between different SMSC types.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>>
>> 2009/8/20 Dino Sane Moreira <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a
patch
>>> or
>>> new version fixing this absolutely basic issue:
>>>
>>> If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
>>>
>>> So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending
>>> process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see
>>> that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that
>>> specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done?
>>>
>>> Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to
>>
>> use
>>>
>>> Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far
>>> bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of
>>> them
>>> freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to
>>
>> the
>>>
>>> others?
>>>
>>> For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when
>>> stop/restart
>>> a
>>> gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Dino
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Donald Jackson
>> http://www.ddj.co.za/
>> donaldjster(a)gmail.com
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>>
<http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090820/279e6667/attachm
>> ent-0003.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:20:42 -0500
>> From: Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message
>> To: Users mailing list <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> You need to configure the store-xxx parameters on core group. If you
>> do not define it, kannel will store on ram and messages will be lost
>> in case kannel or the smsc restarts...
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Alvaro
>>
>>
>>
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------------------|
>> Env?e y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
>> celular y Nextel
>> en el Per?, M?xico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
>> SMS y GPRS online
>> Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
>> www.pravcom.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Dino Sane Moreira<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a
patch
>>
>> or
>>>
>>> new version fixing this absolutely basic issue:
>>>
>>> If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
>>>
>>> So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending
>>> process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see
>>> that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that
>>> specifically operator is gone... And so what? ?What can be done?
>>>
>>> Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to
>>
>> use
>>>
>>> Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far
>>> bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of
>>> them
>>> freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to
>>
>> the
>>>
>>> others?
>>>
>>> For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when
>>> stop/restart
>>
>> a
>>>
>>> gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Dino
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:20:42 -0500
>> From: Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message
>> To: Users mailing list <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> You need to configure the store-xxx parameters on core group. If you
>> do not define it, kannel will store on ram and messages will be lost
>> in case kannel or the smsc restarts...
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Alvaro
>>
>>
>>
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------------------|
>> Env?e y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
>> celular y Nextel
>> en el Per?, M?xico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
>> SMS y GPRS online
>> Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
>> www.pravcom.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Dino Sane Moreira<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a
patch
>>
>> or
>>>
>>> new version fixing this absolutely basic issue:
>>>
>>> If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
>>>
>>> So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending
>>> process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see
>>> that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that
>>> specifically operator is gone... And so what? ?What can be done?
>>>
>>> Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to
>>
>> use
>>>
>>> Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far
>>> bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of
>>> them
>>> freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to
>>
>> the
>>>
>>> others?
>>>
>>> For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when
>>> stop/restart
>>
>> a
>>>
>>> gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Dino
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:00:03 +0300
>> From: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message
>> To: "Alvaro Cornejo" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Message-ID: <000701ca21af$48c03570$02b2a...@tardis>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1253";
>> reply-type=original
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If store-location is misstyped, kannel will panic. How would you guys
feel
>> if this was also the case for store-* not specified?
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alvaro Cornejo"
>> <[email protected]>
>> To: "Users mailing list" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:20 PM
>> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> You need to configure the store-xxx parameters on core group. If you
>> do not define it, kannel will store on ram and messages will be lost
>> in case kannel or the smsc restarts...
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Alvaro
>>
>>
>>
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------------------|
>> Env?e y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
>> celular y Nextel
>> en el Per?, M?xico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
>> SMS y GPRS online
>> Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
>> www.pravcom.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Dino Sane Moreira<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a
patch
>>> or
>>> new version fixing this absolutely basic issue:
>>>
>>> If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost!
>>>
>>> So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending
>>> process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see
>>> that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that
>>> specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done?
>>>
>>> Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to
>>> use
>>> Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far
>>> bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of
>>> them
>>> freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to
>>> the
>>> others?
>>>
>>> For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when
>>> stop/restart
>>
>>> a
>>> gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Dino
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>> End of users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 48
>> *************************************
>>
>>
>
>
>
