Donald, I use "smsc = smpp" and "smsc = at". It happens with any of them, although more with modems.
Alvaro, I have configurated this: store-type = spool store-location = /etc/kannel/store any ideas about? Thanks for promptly reply ! -----Mensagem original----- De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Em nome de [email protected] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 20 de agosto de 2009 13:00 Para: [email protected] Assunto: users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 48 Send users mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Basic queue management - loss of message (Dino Sane Moreira) 2. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Donald Jackson) 3. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Donald Jackson) 4. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Alvaro Cornejo) 5. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Alvaro Cornejo) 6. Re: Basic queue management - loss of message (Nikos Balkanas) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:13:49 -0300 From: "Dino Sane Moreira" <[email protected]> Subject: Basic queue management - loss of message To: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi All, I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch or new version fixing this absolutely basic issue: If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost! So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done? Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to use Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of them freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to the others? For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when stop/restart a gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this? Thanks in advance, Dino ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:44:16 +0200 From: Donald Jackson <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message To: Users mailing list <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" What kind of SMSCs are you using? I noticed that there is some inconsistency with regards to this behaviour between different SMSC types. Thanks, Donald 2009/8/20 Dino Sane Moreira <[email protected]> > Hi All, > > I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch > or > new version fixing this absolutely basic issue: > > If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost! > > So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending > process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see > that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that > specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done? > > Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to use > Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far > bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of them > freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to the > others? > > For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when stop/restart > a > gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this? > > Thanks in advance, > > Dino > > > -- Donald Jackson http://www.ddj.co.za/ donaldjster(a)gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090820/279e6667/attachm ent-0002.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:44:16 +0200 From: Donald Jackson <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message To: Users mailing list <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" What kind of SMSCs are you using? I noticed that there is some inconsistency with regards to this behaviour between different SMSC types. Thanks, Donald 2009/8/20 Dino Sane Moreira <[email protected]> > Hi All, > > I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch > or > new version fixing this absolutely basic issue: > > If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost! > > So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending > process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see > that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that > specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done? > > Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to use > Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far > bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of them > freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to the > others? > > For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when stop/restart > a > gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this? > > Thanks in advance, > > Dino > > > -- Donald Jackson http://www.ddj.co.za/ donaldjster(a)gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090820/279e6667/attachm ent-0003.html> ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:20:42 -0500 From: Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message To: Users mailing list <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi You need to configure the store-xxx parameters on core group. If you do not define it, kannel will store on ram and messages will be lost in case kannel or the smsc restarts... Regards Alvaro |--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------| Env?e y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Per?, M?xico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Dino Sane Moreira<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch or > new version fixing this absolutely basic issue: > > If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost! > > So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending > process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see > that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that > specifically operator is gone... And so what? ?What can be done? > > Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to use > Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far > bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of them > freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to the > others? > > For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when stop/restart a > gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this? > > Thanks in advance, > > Dino > > > ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:20:42 -0500 From: Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message To: Users mailing list <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi You need to configure the store-xxx parameters on core group. If you do not define it, kannel will store on ram and messages will be lost in case kannel or the smsc restarts... Regards Alvaro |--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------| Env?e y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Per?, M?xico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Dino Sane Moreira<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch or > new version fixing this absolutely basic issue: > > If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost! > > So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending > process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see > that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that > specifically operator is gone... And so what? ?What can be done? > > Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to use > Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far > bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of them > freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to the > others? > > For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when stop/restart a > gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this? > > Thanks in advance, > > Dino > > > ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:00:03 +0300 From: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message To: "Alvaro Cornejo" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <000701ca21af$48c03570$02b2a...@tardis> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1253"; reply-type=original Hi, If store-location is misstyped, kannel will panic. How would you guys feel if this was also the case for store-* not specified? BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alvaro Cornejo" <[email protected]> To: "Users mailing list" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:20 PM Subject: Re: Basic queue management - loss of message Hi You need to configure the store-xxx parameters on core group. If you do not define it, kannel will store on ram and messages will be lost in case kannel or the smsc restarts... Regards Alvaro |--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------| Env?e y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Per?, M?xico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Dino Sane Moreira<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm using Kannel for 3 or 4 mounts now and every week I check for a patch > or > new version fixing this absolutely basic issue: > > If you stop a gateway all messages queued are lost! > > So I ask you: if the connection with operator is lost during the sending > process, what options do you have? I mean, you check out the box and see > that you have 498 messages to send yet. The connection with that > specifically operator is gone... And so what? What can be done? > > Of course this does not happens often, otherwise would be impossible to > use > Kannel. But for those who use modems, I think the problem could be far > bigger. A pool of 10 modems receive 5,000 messages to send. If one of them > freeze, the correct would be not redistribute the remaining messages to > the > others? > > For short: is not possible NOT LOOSE the messages queued when stop/restart > a > gateway or bearerbox/smsbox ??? Does anyone know a patch to this? > > Thanks in advance, > > Dino > > > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/users End of users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 48 *************************************
