Well I suppose that code does still have be maintained and taken into account regarding other features?
On 4 May 2012 04:35, Ryan Gauger <rtg...@gmail.com> wrote: > But I do not see how it is a burden to developers. Why not just leave it > as it was? I just don't understand the burden part. Someone please explain > it to me. Thanks!!! > > In Christ, > Ryan > > Sent from my iPod > > On May 3, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Conscious User <consciousu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Em 03-05-2012 13:46, Ryan Gauger escreveu: > >> > >> No, I think the vast majority of users upgrade every release, not just > Long-Term Support releases. I would rather have a simple option in CCSM > than have to get special packages from the web, then from there unpack > them... Again, I think an option would not be a problem. Unity needs to be > more customisable, not less, which is what we are doing here by removing > options. Thanks! > > > > You have been told more than once that part of the problem is > > the burden on developers, yet you never addressed that. > > > > If you insist on ignoring this argument, you give the impression > > that you don't care how burdened the developers are, which is > > a disrespect to them. > > > > -- > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > > Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
