But I do not see how it is a burden to developers. Why not just leave it as it was? I just don't understand the burden part. Someone please explain it to me. Thanks!!!
In Christ, Ryan Sent from my iPod On May 3, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Conscious User <consciousu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em 03-05-2012 13:46, Ryan Gauger escreveu: >> >> No, I think the vast majority of users upgrade every release, not just >> Long-Term Support releases. I would rather have a simple option in CCSM than >> have to get special packages from the web, then from there unpack them... >> Again, I think an option would not be a problem. Unity needs to be more >> customisable, not less, which is what we are doing here by removing options. >> Thanks! > > You have been told more than once that part of the problem is > the burden on developers, yet you never addressed that. > > If you insist on ignoring this argument, you give the impression > that you don't care how burdened the developers are, which is > a disrespect to them. > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
