If a large amount of user want something like dodge back, is it not the case that using third party PPA's, hacks and patches could result in a much more unstable system than if dodge was still there?
I think PPA's are a good idea for those who want a newer version of a particular app but actually relying on a PPA to bring back a feature they have already become used to in a default install is wrong. On 3 May 2012 17:46, Ryan Gauger <rtg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/03/2012 09:38 AM, Benjamin Tegge wrote: > > That depends on what you mean by not respecting the needs of longtime > users. The vast majority is supposed to be upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04, > they never had that feature. You probably mean advanced users that have > seen Unity evolve and that have their own opinions about UI and UX design. > Those are free to install the customized packages provided by the community > and in six month they will move on to a new release and try different > things out. > > > No, I think the vast majority of users upgrade every release, not just > Long-Term Support releases. I would rather have a simple option in CCSM > than have to get special packages from the web, then from there unpack > them... Again, I think an option would not be a problem. Unity needs to be > more customisable, not less, which is what we are doing here by removing > options. Thanks! > > In Christ, > Ryan > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
