Am 04.05.2012 00:55 schrieb "Conscious User" <consciousu...@gmail.com>: > > You have been told more than once that part of the problem is > the burden on developers, yet you never addressed that. > > If you insist on ignoring this argument, you give the impression > that you don't care how burdened the developers are, which is > a disrespect to them.
Thank you, well put. Sadly this topic is again moving in the wrong direction. Why do we have to argue? We now have people in the community willing to maintain custom patched versions of Unity, some may already call that forking. Forking doesn't have to be bad, take the popular Cyanogen Mod for example, they are doing amazing things with Android and some modifications even get merged with the mainline Android. As for Unity, if the patched version would install and integrate nicely alongside with Unity, like another session to choose from at login, most security and stability concerns would be gone, since there would still be the default Unity. I would say the first step has already been made. Now let's bring the people together that are willing to hack custom features into Unity.
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
