> So far it seems everyone is certain about how bad 3.3 is and how good 4.0 > is, and you may be right - but I do hope that you spent the required time > to understand both. What would benifit everyone the most is the fastest, most reliable, feature-rich (past the specs) container/jsp engine out there - be it 3.x, 4.x, or the merging of the two. Hey, why not do that? Take the best from both <shrug>. Possibly a naive attitude, so sue me =) Anyways, having great, dedicated people contemplating forking or plain leaving, over something like this with what appears to be no attempt at a compromise or clarification at least, would really be a shame. - r --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Larry Isaacs
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Rob S.
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and pla... cmanolache
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and... Paul Frieden
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant... satan
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion,... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confus... Hans Bergsten
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 co... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confus... satan
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 co... cmanolache
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 co... Rob S.
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and... Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Petr Jiricka
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Michael Percy
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Michael Percy
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and pla... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and... Nick Bauman
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant... cmanolache
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... GOMEZ Henri