> time explaining to people, "Well, 3.x is sort of this unfinished thing that
> they weren't happy with, so they started 4.x". To me, that DOES give the
3.x and 4.x are 2 different servlet containers, with very different
design. The only confusing thing is the fact that the same name is used
for both, and the number looks like 4 is a continuation of 3. Which one is
better should be based on code reading and real-world testing, not on the
number that is stick on it.
( BTW, the feature set is very different, the core design is different and
of course the performance is different too )
Again, I don't remember when Apache decided to throw away a particular
design and codebase and the reasons behind it, but if Members decide so I
don't think I can do too much about it.
Costin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
