>> I believe development on the 3.x tree MUST continue, until Tomcat 3.x >> truly IS the RI of Servlet 2.2. Anything else would not make sense. >> The numbering (3.2, 3.3) does not matter. >> > > You will find that the 3.3 tree is pretty nearly as big an > architectural change (from 3.2) as is 4.0 (rather than just being > maintenance / bug fixes like the Apache 1.3 / 2.0 example) ... but it's > still academic because no one seems to want to finish what they > started. > If that is the case (ANY architectural changes), I agree with you, Craig. That is IMHO a 'bad idea'. Tomcat 3.x should really just be fixing enough of the code to conform to the spec. Scott Sanders --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Larry Isaacs
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Rob S.
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and pla... cmanolache
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and... Paul Frieden
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant... satan
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion,... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confus... Hans Bergsten
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 co... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confus... satan
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 co... cmanolache
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 co... Rob S.
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and... Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Petr Jiricka
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Michael Percy
- RE: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Michael Percy
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and pla... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and... Nick Bauman
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant... cmanolache
- Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM