Salz, Rich writes: > Well Dan, you claim to have an authoritative and binding source that > disagrees with what I and others have been saying. And you don't quote > them directly.
As I wrote: "naming the source here would be risky given threats by the WG chairs (currently under appeal), so I'm not naming the source in this message". I agree that this is not a desirable situation; maybe you should ask the chairs to stop sabotaging the on-list discussion. I've sent you the authoritative quote and URL off-list. > I have lost track of what you are arguing against. I asked what the authorization is under the IETF standardization process for the (unclear and unusual) procedure that the chairs are following: "Can the WG chairs please clarify which procedure from RFC 2026 (or from RFCs updating RFC 2026) is being followed here?" ---D. J. Bernstein _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
