On Monday, 16 December 2024 22:59:50 CET, Sean Turner wrote:
Ask:
Is the WG consensus to run four separate adoption calls for the
individual I-Ds in question?
I'm FOR adoption of all of the four mentioned drafts.
I don't have a strong opinion if they should be considered separately or
not.
I think there will be enough implementations of each of those drafts that
it's in the wider community interest in ensuring compatibility between
them,
and thus having WG drafts.
What I find a bit surprising, is the omission of the
Use of ML-DSA in TLS 1.3:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa-00
draft from that list...
--
Regards,
Alicja (nee Hubert) Kario
Principal Quality Engineer, RHEL Crypto team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org