Well Dan, you claim to have an authoritative and binding source that disagrees 
with what I and others have been saying. And you don't quote them directly. I 
don't accept that, any more than you would accept my claim to have built a CRQC 
in my basement. And didn't we just go through this kind of thing -- anonymous 
sources filtered through a WG chair -- with the first incarnations of the 
triage panel?

I have lost track of what you are arguing against. If you could explain it in 
under a paragraph of text, that would help me (and probably others) assess your 
position. Or, find someone else who agrees with your positions and ask them to 
post. But right now, you seem a lone wolf baying in the wilderness arguing that 
the WG is doing *something* wrong. What, exactly?

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to