Well Dan, you claim to have an authoritative and binding source that disagrees with what I and others have been saying. And you don't quote them directly. I don't accept that, any more than you would accept my claim to have built a CRQC in my basement. And didn't we just go through this kind of thing -- anonymous sources filtered through a WG chair -- with the first incarnations of the triage panel?
I have lost track of what you are arguing against. If you could explain it in under a paragraph of text, that would help me (and probably others) assess your position. Or, find someone else who agrees with your positions and ask them to post. But right now, you seem a lone wolf baying in the wilderness arguing that the WG is doing *something* wrong. What, exactly? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org