> but the more
> basic procedural point is that demonstrated WG controversy on X should
> be resolved before the WG does X.
No, the IETF does not require controversies to be resolved. It requires "rough
consensus." And to your earlier question, EKR already said that 2418 is the
operative document, not 2026 (except for those wishing to file a formal
appeal). But note this explicit statement of wide latitude being given:
"A number of procedural questions and issues will arise over time, and
it is the function of the Working Group Chair(s) to manage the group process,
keeping in mind that the overall purpose of the group is to make progress
towards reaching rough consensus in realizing the working group's goals and
objectives."
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
