> On Nov 4, 2024, at 15:35, Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:48 AM Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > > While there is overlap between professional behavior and the perceived > > focus on browser specific use cases; I think we should try to separate out > > the topic. > > My memory, perhaps faulty, is that "will browsers implement this" has been a > process-gating question in the past. Recognizing that not everything the WG > will do is useful or applicable to all participants is, I think, a useful > reminder for, well, all participants.
Not faulty, I definitely asked this at the end of the TLS 1.3 development, because we really wanted to make sure we got buy in. It may have happened other times too, but I don’t remember it happening recently. We should be saying "who will implement." > Yes. I think we can do that as a separate reminder I tend to agree and I would like to propose that we update the FAQ and then send a separate reminder to list about the FAQ. More reminders, I think, can’t hurt. spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
