> On 10 Sep 2024, at 00:17, Andrei Popov <andrei.po...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > This makes sense, however shouldn’t draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-01 be > on the Standards track? > Also, what is the thinking behind “Recommended: N” for the code points?
The draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design draft is on the Informational track. I thought it makes sense to keep same standardisation track for draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem. My understanding (according to RFC 8126, section 4.9) is that "Recommended: Y” requires documents to be standardised in Standards or BCP tracks, as we don’t then Recommended is set to N. Hence, that’s the logic behind it. Cheers, Kris _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
