Re: [Tagging] Doorzone bicycle lanes

[Lukas-458]

Hmm okay, convinced. I only hope noone else comes with that topic later again then, but to me it's ok.

 

-- Lukas

Gesendet: Mittwoch, 06. Mai 2020 um 14:15 Uhr
Von: "Andrew Harvey" <andrew.harv...@gmail.com>
An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org>
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Doorzone bicycle lanes

 

 

On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 22:08, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:

sent from a phone

> On 6. May 2020, at 13:20, lukas-...@web.de wrote:
>
> I agree with that, but then note that for "justice" we would need a foot:doorzone=yes, too, because when a sidewalk is in the parking car's doorzone (I think most sidewalks next to parking:lane=parallel are), there is hazard for pedestrians, too. It might be not soo dangerus because pedestrians have much lower speed than cyclists often have, but if we want to tag that hazard I think we would have to affect both, foot and bicycle.



indeed there is much fewer risk for pedestrians and I would not tag it. Next thing would be to add hazards for roof tiles that may fly from roofs in case of storm? Snow sliding from roofs in winter? There may be many hazards if you think it through...
;-)

 

I agree with Martin here, I don't think "foot:doorzone" is really needed as the concept only applies to bicycles.

_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging