On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 22:08, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > sent from a phone > > > On 6. May 2020, at 13:20, lukas-...@web.de wrote: > > > > I agree with that, but then note that for "justice" we would need a > foot:doorzone=yes, too, because when a sidewalk is in the parking car's > doorzone (I think most sidewalks next to parking:lane=parallel are), there > is hazard for pedestrians, too. It might be not soo dangerus because > pedestrians have much lower speed than cyclists often have, but if we want > to tag that hazard I think we would have to affect both, foot and bicycle. > > > > indeed there is much fewer risk for pedestrians and I would not tag it. > Next thing would be to add hazards for roof tiles that may fly from roofs > in case of storm? Snow sliding from roofs in winter? There may be many > hazards if you think it through... > ;-) > I agree with Martin here, I don't think "foot:doorzone" is really needed as the concept only applies to bicycles.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
