On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 23:32, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here in Italy we do have both cycle lanes, cycle paths, and foot-cycle > paths with dooring risk. So far I have not seen any tagging for these, but > I would welcome a uniform approach for tagging this hazard on any type of > cycling infrastructure, and it should be a hazard tag. In that context I > would like to have also a way of tagging the danger of pedestrians crossing > the cycle path/lane (e.g. cycle lane between roadside parking spaces and > sidewalk <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/kHccQlhkg7y5sXQLP_N2ZQ>; another > example <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ewtPBxYM_289cWusHEWytw> - both > show passenger-door hazard) > I would not put the hazard on the car parking spaces, it needs to go on > the way the cyclist takes. > That example of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343935838 is a good one since it's not a bicycle lane, it's physically separated from the road and mapped as shared path using a way separate from the road (bicycle=designated + foot=designated + segregated=yes). So in that case I do agree that this door zone concept doesn't just apply to on road bicycle lanes (cycleway=lane). Maybe cycleway:doorzone=yes/no=buffer is better than cycleway:lane:doorzone then so it can apply to all types of bicycle ways.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
