Hi Paul, Good point. I don't know ... maybe there will be some cases where there is no improved alternative to amenity=drinking_water.
I will rephrase the above ... "I can see that removing amenity=drinking_water as a tag in many cases makes sense " Best regards, Stuart On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 17:04, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 15:50, European Water Project < > europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I also agree that removing amenity=drinking_water as a tag makes sense. >> The physical attributes of a node/way still exists - irrespective of >> whether the water is drinking quality. For example, a spring which has >> water polluted after a big storm, stays a spring. >> > > How are you going to handle an amenity=drinking_water that is a tap? It's > not > a fountain (ornamental or otherwise). It's not a spring. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
