I mean, these route variants can probably be remapped as superroute if
superroute become more popular
2019年3月15日 06:34 於 "marc marc" <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> 寫道:

a route_master isn't a superroute, isn't it ?
it's a collection off all variant of a "single" route
  and not several part of one route like superroute for E-network

route_master are well documented/used for bus route
but if someone want to convert a single type=route into a superroute (so
a type=route having relation as member), imho it's better to make a
propal with a good doc to allow app to add this case.
if not, currently valid route 'll become unusable in all app.
so sure that's the best/most need thing todo with PT version :(

Le 14.03.19 à 23:25, Phake Nick a écrit :

> It really depends on exactly how complex the route is, something like
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4776035 this bus route can
> definitely use it. (and I haven't mentioned other similar bus routes
> with different numbers in different relationship yet)
>
> 在 2019年3月15日週五 03:31,Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com
> <mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>> 寫道:

>
>     On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:pelder...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Op do 14 mrt. 2019 om 18:17 schreef Paul Allen
>         <pla16...@gmail.com <mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>>:

>
>             On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 15:09, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com
>             <mailto:winfi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                 I would definitely want routes to be composed of
>                 subroutes which are shared with other routes,
>
>
>             I see that as less than useful for any route I know of.
>
>
>         It's useful for longer routes through walking/cycling node
>         networks, using the network signposting.
>
>
>     Yeah, I can see it would be.  And for longer bus routes.  Just not
>     for any of the bus routes I know
>     around here and am likely to map.  You end up with the only common
>     segments being very short
>     around a central bus station, then they all diverge.  Once diverged,
>     there is nothing to share.
>
>     I'm not against such sharing in principle, where it makes sense.
>     But if it comes at the price
>     that all bus stops have to be in the aggregate relation and not in
>     the subroutes then it becomes
>     useless for my purposes.  And I freely admit that my purposes are a
>     fairly rare case, but I'd
>     still like to handle it.
>
>     --
>     Paul
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to