a route_master isn't a superroute, isn't it ? it's a collection off all variant of a "single" route and not several part of one route like superroute for E-network
route_master are well documented/used for bus route but if someone want to convert a single type=route into a superroute (so a type=route having relation as member), imho it's better to make a propal with a good doc to allow app to add this case. if not, currently valid route 'll become unusable in all app. so sure that's the best/most need thing todo with PT version :( Le 14.03.19 à 23:25, Phake Nick a écrit : > It really depends on exactly how complex the route is, something like > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4776035 this bus route can > definitely use it. (and I haven't mentioned other similar bus routes > with different numbers in different relationship yet) > > 在 2019年3月15日週五 03:31，Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com > <mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>> 寫道： > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com > <mailto:pelder...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Op do 14 mrt. 2019 om 18:17 schreef Paul Allen > <pla16...@gmail.com <mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>>: > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 15:09, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com > <mailto:winfi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I would definitely want routes to be composed of > subroutes which are shared with other routes, > > > I see that as less than useful for any route I know of. > > > It's useful for longer routes through walking/cycling node > networks, using the network signposting. > > > Yeah, I can see it would be. And for longer bus routes. Just not > for any of the bus routes I know > around here and am likely to map. You end up with the only common > segments being very short > around a central bus station, then they all diverge. Once diverged, > there is nothing to share. > > I'm not against such sharing in principle, where it makes sense. > But if it comes at the price > that all bus stops have to be in the aggregate relation and not in > the subroutes then it becomes > useless for my purposes. And I freely admit that my purposes are a > fairly rare case, but I'd > still like to handle it. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
