It really depends on exactly how complex the route is, something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4776035 this bus route can definitely use it. (and I haven't mentioned other similar bus routes with different numbers in different relationship yet)
在 2019年3月15日週五 03:31，Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> 寫道： > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Op do 14 mrt. 2019 om 18:17 schreef Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com>: >> >>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 15:09, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I would definitely want routes to be composed of subroutes which are >>>> shared with other routes, >>>> >>> >>> I see that as less than useful for any route I know of. >>> >> >> It's useful for longer routes through walking/cycling node networks, >> using the network signposting. >> > > Yeah, I can see it would be. And for longer bus routes. Just not for any > of the bus routes I know > around here and am likely to map. You end up with the only common > segments being very short > around a central bus station, then they all diverge. Once diverged, there > is nothing to share. > > I'm not against such sharing in principle, where it makes sense. But if > it comes at the price > that all bus stops have to be in the aggregate relation and not in the > subroutes then it becomes > useless for my purposes. And I freely admit that my purposes are a fairly > rare case, but I'd > still like to handle it. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
