On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Op do 14 mrt. 2019 om 18:17 schreef Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com>: > >> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 15:09, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I would definitely want routes to be composed of subroutes which are >>> shared with other routes, >>> >> >> I see that as less than useful for any route I know of. >> > > It's useful for longer routes through walking/cycling node networks, using > the network signposting. > Yeah, I can see it would be. And for longer bus routes. Just not for any of the bus routes I know around here and am likely to map. You end up with the only common segments being very short around a central bus station, then they all diverge. Once diverged, there is nothing to share. I'm not against such sharing in principle, where it makes sense. But if it comes at the price that all bus stops have to be in the aggregate relation and not in the subroutes then it becomes useless for my purposes. And I freely admit that my purposes are a fairly rare case, but I'd still like to handle it. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
