On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 12:47 +0100, pmailkeey . wrote: > > > On 29 May 2015 at 12:42, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34, John Willis napisał(a): > > I know there is a way to tag what the building as to > what it was > initially used for - but i don't think that is the > proper way (afaik). > > So what do you think about building=church + amenity=museum > then? > > I think we need some clear, general rules. Current system is > horrible in this matter, but I'd like it to be at least a bit > coherent. > > > > building=museum. > > > A museum is no more an amenity than a house is. > A museum, as a public educational establishment fits the tag amenity perfectly.
Although not the type of amenity estate agents usually describe. Phil (trigpoint) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
