2015-05-29 8:36 GMT+02:00 Lauri Kytömaa <lkyto...@gmail.com>: > landuse=forest and natural=wood are a poor example for historical > reasons, when some thought that natural=wood together with > landuse=forest was "redundant", when it's not: >
+1, also because inside a natural=wood/forest object (an entity with a name, maybe composed of smaller entities with different names, maybe not) you can have different kind of landuses and landcover and objects (e.g. a lake, a meadow, a campsite, even a hamlet,...). FWIW, there is also "woodland", which is less dense compared to a forest. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
