The use of tourism=camp_site to represent a campgound or camping area will continue to confuse and confound this proposal. If the term camp_site should could be redefined to mean a spot (or pitch) where one can erect a tent or park an RV many of those problems will vanish. If you should become bold enough to try to redefine that tag, I'll support you totally.
Cheers, Dave On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> wrote: > > > On May 1, 2015, at 10:17 PM, David Bannon <dban...@internode.on.net> > wrote: > > > > Hmm, lets experiment ... > > > > Node > > tourism = camp_site > > camp_site = standard > > name = Happy Jacks > > > > Node > > tourism = camp_site > > camp_pitch = yes > > ref = 42 > > addr:unit = 42 > > camp_pitch:picnic_table=yes > > > > Node > > .... > > > > What I don't see here is how to associate the pitches with "Happy > > Jacks". I guess the easy solution is to say only map pitches where they > > will fall into an (tourism=camp_site) area ? Hard solution is a > > relation ? > > > > If you are doing detail mapping of a campground you should replace a > tourism=camp_site node with a polygon. So you are mapping pitches within > that campground polygon with either nodes or smaller polygons. > > So a node with both tourism=camp_site and camp_pitch=yes would only make > sense if there were one and only one place to pitch a tent (park a caravan) > in the campground. > > (I wish it was tourism=campground which would leave “site” or “camp_site” > available for the individual pitches. To my American ears “pitch” is more > likely a verb than a noun (“pitch a ball on a playing field” or “pitch a > tent at a camp site” but that ship has sailed). > > > I think its sad we cannot put something more useful than "yes" after > > camp_pitch= but I know someone saw a problem with my suggestion of > > camp_pitch=42 ? > > That makes sense to me too and I may have suggested it at one time but it > does get resistance. :) > > > > > Starting to look like this is firming up anyway, good, we need these > > solutions. I notice that user N76 says he did a good part of the > > camp_site=pitch on record and is happy to rename them. We appreciate > > such a helpful attitude ! (Voting on the camp_site= proposal page). > > > > As you may have figured out by now, n76 is my OSM mapping ID. :) > > Cheers, > Tod > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
