On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > 2014-12-12 17:28 GMT+01:00 fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com>: >> >> Am 05.12.2014 um 21:30 schrieb Paul Johnson: >> > How about site relations? Seems like a good use of a site relation. >> >> As long as it possible to draw the whole site as a single polygon, there >> is no need of a site relation. >> > > > +1 > unless you want to express some particular relation between some of the > members (i.e. use a role different than outer/inner). > > I'm curious if we're thinking the same thing. http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site (granted, while it's not my proposal, with two or three uses I've generated myself, it wouldn't surprise me if I'm the most prolific user of it thus far...)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging