Le 05/11/2024 à 19:38, domcox a écrit :
yvand <yvand.sw...@gmail.com> writes:
For Segond 1910, the text is in public domain. I used mod2imp to get
the text from the FreSegond (Crosswire) module months
ago. The only changes we made are about versification. Indeed all our
texts use the same versification (based on WLC, for OT =
German in sword), so the text matches the original (hebrew WLC or
greek MT/WH) one and we can easily compare
translations.
As lot of people still read the printed French Segond 1910 or
derivatives, I think it's very important to match the printed
versification. Regular readers generally view Bible software with not
matching versifications as second-rate software.
We have a matching Bible Segond versification, let's keep it that way.
In the past, the FreLSG module had Strong's numbers. If I am correct
(see discussion "Strong numbers for Louis Segond" in
2013/07), we do not have the authorization (but still available in
STEP) so this module has been removed or replaced by
FreSegond module (renamed ?).
In the past, the FreLSG had Strong's numbers. It was upgraded later to
a new version that was horrible, filled with errors
and even containing deuteros that never existed in the Segond Bible.
This is why I made the FreSegond module, it was not an easy task. The
Segond Bible is everywhere on the Web, but it looks like
all sites use the same source, and it's not accurate.
The fraLSG1910eb (F10) module is a more recent one, available in
e-bible repo with headings, WoC and Strong's numbers. It
seems to be a work in progress for Strong's numbers. They are not
available for all books. I compare Strong's numbers
affectations for the first verses of Genesis 1 (see attached
screenshot) but there are errors in this module. On the left this
module, on the right our data (https://concordance.bible/Sg1910/Gen/1/).
If I remember well, Michael have access to the DBL, so his module is
certainly based on the official Public Domain version,
edited by the Alliance Biblique Française
(https://lire.la-bible.net/bible/LSG/GEN.1)
So I contact all of you (especially actual maintainers of Segond 1910
modules and French users) what would be the
best way of giving our Strong's numbers for Segond 1910 in a sword
module. I don't know who is concerned or interested
that's why I send to the mailing list.
As there is already many existing Segond 1910 sword module, it guess
it would not be a good idea of creating a new one. On
one side, as our text is based from FreSegond module, it might be a
good idea of updating this module with Strong's numbers
(the only difference is versification). On the other hand, the
fraLSG1910eb module offers Strong's numbers but our data seems
more accurate and complete, so it could be interesting of updating
this module. In any case, it would be important to submit
updates regularly for Strong's numbers.
I think the best option for this module should be:
1. Have access to the DBL version
And why not with the wikisource text? It's really easy to contribute in
the event of an error. It's easy to maintain. The only thing we need to
do now is add notes. And we have nothing to ask to someone else...
2. Update the current CrossWire module from that source with
footnotes, comments and cross-references, keeping the original
versification
3. Add Strong's numbers
--
Vous aimez la Bible ? Vous êtes étudiant en théologie ? Utilisez
l'application libre Xiphos <https://xiphos.org/> ou Andbible
<https://andbible.github.io/> et accédez aux textes sources, à des
commentaires, des dictionnaires et beaucoup d'autres fonctionnalités...
Me contacter pour des traductions en français._______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
