> Quote from Jack Gostl: > "The RBLs are nice, but i have a half dozen spams a week slip through because of spamc/spamd timeouts, which I'd bet are RBL related."
Hello, I was asking last week about the spam that get through on my system that all report this in the header: qmail-scanner-1.20rc3 (clamscan: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:0:SA:0(?/?):. Someone on the list suggested that the (?/?) means my spamd isn't running. I've been having problems with spamd dying on its own (any daemon monitor scripts available for this?) but now I'm wondering how much the RBL's might have on this one. Is there a way to make local cache copies of the lists and check against those instead of network requesting all the time? Any other ideas on why I might get (?/?) scores? Have any of you disabled RBL checks and been happy with the outcome? I havn't figured out how to get bayes to work yet, because I can't figure out an easy way to get emails from my users to a learnable corpus. Any suggestions on this might be helpful too. Thanks, Russell ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
