On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Jack Gostl wrote:
> I sometimes wonder if the whole system wouldn't be smaller and stabler if
> it were entirely Bayes based.

Well, sure it would be.  But frankly, if you want Bayes only, there
are several other projects out there to look at... SpamBayes, CRM114,
etc, etc.

Bayes works fairly well on its own, assuming decent learning, until
spammers start attacking the algorithm or the code.  Then it kind of
falls on its face until the attack is countered.

The idea of SA is to use multiple detection systems such that even if
one or two don't work, the message will still probably be caught from
the others.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Remember, the difference between God and the DBA is that God doesn't think
 he's a DBA ;)"  - Richard Basile

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to