> > it down so low that it was autolearned as ham. To fix, I ran sa-learn > > --forget over the message and then re-learned it as spam, removing the > > you can just learn it as spam, it'll auto-forget. > > > habeas mark beforehand. Is there maybe a better way SpamAssassin could > > handle habeas marked email, to counteract this apparent vulnerability? > > The Habeas folks are supposed to put the sender on their infringer's list, > which SA will pick up on and add positive points back to the message.
Just got a bunch of these myself. Are you suggesting that we simply learn them as spam and ignore them otherwise and then let nature take its course? Or should I foward this stuff someplace. -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
