guenther - read some of the messages posted please?! This isn't on topic - how you handle privacy concerns vs. submitting enough information for habeas to pursue a lawsuit is a matter for you (and perhaps your own legal counsel) and them to discuss.
If you are looking for a place, there are probably lots of general Spam lists out there - this list is for Spam Assassin and support and integration of it - not Habeas. A general rule of thumb for lists is that your post should be related directly to the topic of the list. 3rd party legal actions beyond how they impact on the performance or operation of SpamAssassin are not. After many people have expressed an interest in no longer hearing about habeas abuse (other than discussion about score adjustments in the event they are not prompt in responding to prevent abuse) continued questions about THEM are just going to tick people off - particularly when you haven't even appeared to try contacting THEM first... People here might be interested a) if they are non-responsive to your inquiry b) if they are doing something to prevent the abuse But if they are not quick, the universal action is likely to be a simple score adjustment. Have a nice day. m/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of guenther Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 9:00 AM To: Theo Van Dinter Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Phony Habeas mark on spam...I knew it was just amatter of time On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 23:26, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 05:18:30PM -0500, Jack Gostl wrote: > > Just got a bunch of these myself. Are you suggesting that we simply > > learn them as spam and ignore them otherwise and then let nature take its > > course? Or should I foward this stuff someplace. > > Send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I dug through my spam corpus and found > 8 so far this month and just sent them off. We'll see what happens. I just received those buggers slipping through some hours before this discussion started myself. And they are still dripping in. I would love to report them, but I am concerned about some private information in the headers. This is especially the Delivered-To: header, which reveals the user name which my ISP uses -- and later added local headers. I don't think they are useful at all for Habeas. So the question is: May I safely cut that information out, when forwarding those messages to Habeas? And thoughts? TIA ...guenther -- char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
