> > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > Send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I dug through my spam corpus and found > > > 8 so far this month and just sent them off. We'll see what happens. > > > > I agree on reporting them. But it should be obvious in the short term, if > > these things become annoying, just set the score for the habeas rule to 0. > > > > - Charles > > I just sent my copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it bounced. I personally > think it was a REALLY bad idea to include these jokers in the scoring.
I'll be honest guys, for Unix users who set up a good training schedule, you could almost run on Bayes alone. The RBLs are nice, but i have a half dozen spams a week slip through because of spamc/spamd timeouts, which I'd bet are RBL related. I sometimes wonder if the whole system wouldn't be smaller and stabler if it were entirely Bayes based. BUT I LOVE SPAMASSASSIN!!!!!!!!!!! DO NOT FEEL UNAPPRECIATED!!!!!! -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
