On Monday, November 24, 2003 4:24 PM -0800 Logan Harbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The point of using the old version of SpamAssassin was to show how > much the technology has changed in the last few years. That was > stated in my original article but edited out of the final version. > (I love copy editors.)
....rest removed.... It's obvious that this is a canned response from Logan, who apparently is putting as much thought into his replies as he did his review. I think the appropriate tactic now should be to deluge the Letters to the Editor of Infoworld... (not mailbomb - just alot of well written replies to the article) -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes Computer Systems Manager ph: 979-845-7801 Department of Physics fax: 979-845-2590 Texas A&M University ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
