--On Sunday, November 23, 2003 4:19 PM -0800 Logan Harbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The article as I originally wrote it wasn't intended to be > anti-SpamAssassin, but I'd still have to say that even if the performance > at catching spam and false positives were comparable to the other > packages, installation, management, the user experience and reporting are > not comparable to the other packages reviewed. Unless you're an > experienced Linux systems administrator, <SNIP> Then you shouldn't be a system administrator of a linux based system. A mechanic of 2 seater Cessna's wouldn't be repairing a 747 or DC-10. A helicopter pilot wouldn't fly a DC-10. Why would anything but a experienced Linux System Administrator be administrating a linux System? > ...Spam Asssassin is much more difficult to install and configure than > the other packages... SpamAssassin is also probably more powerful than other packages. > and the focus of the article was general anti-spam > technologies, rather than Linux-based packages. Perhaps than Linux based packages should have been left out? Was this an article directed at IT staff or the end user? If I were an end user, and read your article, I'd probably be pretty upset if my ISP used SA. It sure sounds like a BAD program to me! Do you mind if I copy your reply to my on list post (you sent it via e-mail, not cc'd to the list) to the list? Thanks. Evan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
