On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > Well, a copy-paste of some interpretation of the message by pine isn't > really going to give us much useful information to go on. > However, I'd venture to guess that the MIME construction is of a nature > which confuses SA.. For example, a bug that was present in SA 2.55 but was > fixed in SA 2.60 involves mis-parsing messages that have a confusing empty > mime section. Looking at the message you have, it appears there was a > similar empty mime part.
Yes, there was. I checked the raw mailbox. > Any chance you can test your message against a reasonably recent version so > that we can tell if it's a bug that's been fixed or not? 2.44's a bit on > the stale side and there's been a whole lot of bug fixes since then. As noted, I'm going to download 2.60 and install it tomorrow. Thanks. - Charles ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
