Is there something about the windows charset that throws off the recipe? Or are they using 'high bit' to invalidate the regex?
Well, a copy-paste of some interpretation of the message by pine isn't really going to give us much useful information to go on.
However, I'd venture to guess that the MIME construction is of a nature which confuses SA.. For example, a bug that was present in SA 2.55 but was fixed in SA 2.60 involves mis-parsing messages that have a confusing empty mime section. Looking at the message you have, it appears there was a similar empty mime part.
See this bug: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2478
Any chance you can test your message against a reasonably recent version so that we can tell if it's a bug that's been fixed or not? 2.44's a bit on the stale side and there's been a whole lot of bug fixes since then.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
