John writes: > I have been running spamassassin 2.55 for some time (am about to go to > 2.60).
Do. 2.60 fixes quite a few things, shuts down now-long-gone RBLs, improves scoring, and (even though I was originally a skeptic) performs well enough (sans Bayes). > Everything has been working well, with most spam being blocked. Most of > the nasty stuff that gets through is image only PORN spam. > > Is it possible to tell SA to score an image only mail that contains > links a lot higher? That way someone sending pictures of his kid to > grandma would not get blocked, because he would not have HREFs behind > the image. I wrote an eval() hack (many would call it a crock) that detected such silliness, but was then informed that "it was all taken care of in 2.60". Sure enough, my inelegant little bit was much more thoughtfully incorporated into 2.60, albeit with (for me, at least) a wee bit of under-scoring for the spam form. Cheers. +------------------------------------------------+---------------------+ | Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston | | Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA | | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +---------------------+ | http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum | ICBM: 42:22N 71:47W | +------------------------------------------------+---------------------+ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
