[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>as you point out, the problem is spammers can forge what's in the helo
>message just as they forge what's in MAIL FROM.
>
>but also, unfortunately, a way large percentage of sites do not have 
>correctly configured names in their helos.
>
>(some have ip addresses. some have their non-fully-qualified names.)
>
>i turned this on just as a warning and recently and discovered that
>around 15% of correspondents cause warnings.
>
>turning it on as an error will probably turn away mail from legit
>correspondents.
>
>(however, i suspect the absence of a legit HELO string could be
>productively used for grading by SA.)

It is -- if the MTA adds it in the Received header.  Most do.
We've found that strict checking doesn't work very well, but
*some* tests work OK as heuristics.

--j.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to