On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following on 03/12/02 22:23: > > On that note, is it best to just run spamd standalone in the background or > > inetd (not interested in using daemontools unless it's really needed). It > > seems to like standalone fine, but I don't see anything re: this in the > > docs. > > I understand not wanting to run daemontools unless you have to, but it > really is the best way to do it. You get very nice memory management, > and if spamd dies daemontools will just start it up again (and protect > against looping die/restarts).
Daemontools isn't/shouldn't be necessary to run spamd. In fact, the system on which I run spamd doesn't have anything called "daemontools" (or "daemon-tools") installed on it. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
