On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 05:23:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thanks for the help, Mike, Matt and Dave! I misunderstood the > qmail-scanner docs to mean that SA just needed to be installed properly. > not that spamd needed to be running. > > On that note, is it best to just run spamd standalone in the background or > inetd (not interested in using daemontools unless it's really needed). It > seems to like standalone fine, but I don't see anything re: this in the > docs.
The whole point of spamd is to run it standalone, to run it any other way (which really isn't possible anyway if I remember right,) would defeat its special purpose: to speed up SA by avoiding perl's 'expensive' execution. If you aren't concerned about this, you can just run spamassassin. -- Kelsey Cummings - [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonic.net System Administrator 2260 Apollo Way 707.522.1000 (Voice) Santa Rosa, CA 95407 707.547.2199 (Fax) http://www.sonic.net/ Fingerprint = 7F 59 43 1B 44 8A 0D 57 91 08 73 73 7A 48 90 C5 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
