Re: [SAtalk] qmail catch-22?

[Matt Sergeant]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following on 03/12/02 22:23:

Thanks for the help, Mike, Matt and Dave!  I misunderstood the
qmail-scanner docs to mean that SA just needed to be installed properly.
not that spamd needed to be running.

On that note, is it best to just run spamd standalone in the background or
inetd (not interested in using daemontools unless it's really needed).  It
seems to like standalone fine, but I don't see anything re: this in the
docs.

I understand not wanting to run daemontools unless you have to, but it really is the best way to do it. You get very nice memory management, and if spamd dies daemontools will just start it up again (and protect against looping die/restarts).

Matt.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk