Harry Putnam wrote: > Maybe a little different approach wouldn't require as much huffing > and puffing: > header Spama X-BeenThere =~ spamassassin-.*@lists > score Spama -100 > > So to get to spam status the score must go over +100. > > I haven't tested this much yet. Only started it when I say this > thread.
Sure, that's a fine idea, or something like it. But it should not be neccessary. SA white listing should take care of it - that's what it's there for. Bryan -- Labor exploitation hurts us all - Sign the petition: http://www.zazona.com/h1bpetition/P/facts.html Proud ugly web site owner: http://www.wecs.com http://www.wecs.com/bio_ailinks.htm; http://www.wecs.com/spam.htm http://www.wecs.com/resume.htm _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
