Craig R Hughes wrote: > Wecs.com person: > > please be smarter about passing sa-talk digest messages through SA and > then > sending bounce messages to the mailing list. > > Thanks, > > C
Hi Craig, Got any salt to go with this egg all over my face? Not sure what's going on though. I just switched to Digest mode. The devel group did not have a problem (that I know of, and the digest got through). Here's what's in my user_prefs: whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seems like these ought to cover all basis, though I don't know what the relative SA logic is. I did notice this header in the talk digest: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which contains 'request', so this 'from' address is not white listed. Though shouldn't the whitelist_to have been enough to allow it through?. I'll add it to my white lists nonetheless. Though it seems like what I already had should have been enough - when I switched to digest mode, I didn't notice anything to indicate a change was neccessary. Bryan -- Labor exploitation hurts us all - Sign the petition: http://www.zazona.com/h1bpetition/P/facts.html Proud ugly web site owner: http://www.wecs.com http://www.wecs.com/bio_ailinks.htm; http://www.wecs.com/spam.htm http://www.wecs.com/resume.htm _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
