On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 07:13:09PM -0500, dman wrote: > Sure. And a default to off of any superfluous tests achieves this as > well. BTW, Duncan, are you using spamd? On my (relatively fast) > system I see a major difference bewteen using spamd and > 'spamassassin'. (most scans take 1 second or so with spamd on my box) >
Yes. I am. I think it would take an hour after I start my computer is I used spamassassin -p, rather than 20 minutes :-) -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
