I'm fine if you want to test this out. What I personally think, and what
testing shows, are often two very different things ;)

best,
Joe

On 15 October 2015 at 15:20, Gregory Varnum <[email protected]> wrote:

> I’ll offer my two cents having seen this discussion play out a few times
> with political movements - so disclaimer that there are differences and
> what works for some may not work for us. Anyway…
>
> I personally think that things like “Please R/T” or “Click like” will be
> seen as engagement strategies and avoided by users. However, each time I’ve
> seen this debate play out in an A/B test, the strategies do work. Usually
> for things that were opinions - “Like if you support XYZ issue” or “R/T if
> you agree that ABC should happen”. When the same graphic or article was
> posted on two FB Pages of similar size and scope, we would continuously see
> that messages which ask for engagement got more engagement.
>
> I’m not sure if this is something where those working in communications
> are so familiar with the strategies we question if they will work, or we
> just see them so much we get tired of them ourselves. Sort of like LGBT
> activists tendency to dislike the rainbow a few years into the work. ;) Or
> it’s a situation where we say we won’t do something - like buy newspapers
> that talk about scandals - but our behavior when we are not analyzing
> things betrays us (sales of newspapers featuring scandals go through the
> roof).
>
> Either way, my hunch is that the requests, when attached to the right kind
> of message, do engage more folks (despite my personal feelings toward
> that). I agree a discussion and possibly testing of this concept is a good
> idea. As always, it is possible Wikimedians are the exception to the rule.
> ;)
>
> -greg
>
>
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Jeff Elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's a good discussion. Our reach dwindles to as low as 30,000 (of our 5
> million fans) if we just push out our links. Then everything suffers: blog
> traffic, page growth, engagement, etc. Conversely, highly engaged posts
> raise everything. And we have to remember our Facebook fans, especially
> recent ones, are mostly readers not editors, and are looking to connect
> with us.
>
> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Andrew Sherman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I totally understand what you mean and would really enjoy discussing
>> those uses of "click like" or "comment below" :).
>>
>> I think they can work I just am unfamiliar with what situations we use
>> them for, when it's not redundant etc.
>>
>> Otherwise LGTM.
>>
>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Jeff Elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Those are good points. I suppose people can click like to just indicate
>>> yes. My experience is that online and social media veterans bristle a bit
>>> at "click like," but a lot of people also do it. Our audience is very
>>> diverse, and seems to embrace basic common denominators. So I'd rather not
>>> rule it out uniformly. But I see the point today. So:
>>>
>>> Have you ever looked up a celebrity on Wikipedia? Who?
>>>
>>> All in favor? Opposed?
>>>
>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Andrew Sherman <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I also kinda agree. I watch *a lot* of youtube and it might be
>>>> personal but the whole action of asking for engagement kinda turns me off
>>>> ("subscribe if you want more content, click like to let me know what you
>>>> think", etc).
>>>>
>>>> I think the proposed question "have you ever looked up a celebrity on
>>>> Wikipedia?" is sufficient enough to get engagement; maybe even ask why or
>>>> what did you find out to the question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Joe Sutherland <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure I like "Click like if..." personally, seems kind of
>>>>> cheap. And surely everyone's looked up a celebrity one time or another?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 October 2015 at 14:28, Jeff Elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Click like if you have ever looked up a celebrity on Wikipedia. If
>>>>>> you remember one, we'd love to hear who in a comment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts? Engagement is a goal right now, and getting our large
>>>>>> audience of mostly readers more involved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jeff Elder
>>>>>> Digital communications manager
>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>> 704-650-4130
>>>>>> @jeffelder <https://twitter.com/JeffElder>
>>>>>> @wikipedia <https://twitter.com/wikipedia>
>>>>>> The Wikimedia blog <https://blog.wikimedia.org/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Social-media mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Joe Sutherland*
>>>>> Communications Intern [remote]
>>>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu>  | w:
>>>>> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Social-media mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew Sherman
>>>> Digital Communications | Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>
>>>> *E:* [email protected]
>>>> *WMF:* ASherman (WMF)
>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:ASherman_(WMF)>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeff Elder
>>> Digital communications manager
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> 704-650-4130
>>> @jeffelder <https://twitter.com/JeffElder>
>>> @wikipedia <https://twitter.com/wikipedia>
>>> The Wikimedia blog <https://blog.wikimedia.org/>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sherman
>> Digital Communications | Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>> *E:* [email protected]
>> *WMF:* ASherman (WMF)
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:ASherman_(WMF)>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jeff Elder
> Digital communications manager
> Wikimedia Foundation
> 704-650-4130
> @jeffelder <https://twitter.com/JeffElder>
> @wikipedia <https://twitter.com/wikipedia>
> The Wikimedia blog <https://blog.wikimedia.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>
>


-- 
*Joe Sutherland*
Communications Intern [remote]
m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to