serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol with cold attribute [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol in function ending in call [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol in function ending in call [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol in function ending in call [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol in function ending in call [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Integrated: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol in function ending in call Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 8365047: Remove exception handler stub code in C2 [v5] Ruben
• RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Evgeny Astigeevich
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v3] Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v3] Chad Rakoczy
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v3] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 [v3] Dean Long
  • Integrated: 8369147: Various issues with new tests added by JDK-8316694 Chad Rakoczy
• RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v3] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Yudi Zheng
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v3] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Amit Kumar
  • Integrated: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v3] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v3] Yudi Zheng
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v3] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Fei Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8365191: Cleanup after removing LockingMode related code Martin Doerr
• RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] Florian Weimer
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] Florian Weimer
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v3] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v3] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v2] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v4] Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v4] Ivan Walulya
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v4] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Integrated: 8369186: HotSpot Style Guide should permit some uses of the C++ Standard Library Kim Barrett
• Re: RFR: 8365072: Refactor tests to use PEM API (Phase 2) [v3] Mikhail Yankelevich
• Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead [v2] Alan Bateman
• Integrated: 8356548: Use ClassFile API instead of ASM to transform classes in tests Chen Liang
• RFR: 8370074: Remove unused code in AbstractDebuggeeTest.java Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8370074: Remove unused code in AbstractDebuggeeTest.java Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8370074: Remove unused code in AbstractDebuggeeTest.java Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8370074: Remove unused code in AbstractDebuggeeTest.java Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8370074: Remove unused code in AbstractDebuggeeTest.java Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8370074: Remove unused code in AbstractDebuggeeTest.java Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Integrated: 8370074: Remove unused code in AbstractDebuggeeTest.java Albert Mingkun Yang
• RFR: 8370036: TestJhsdbJstackWithVirtualThread.java fails when run with -showversion Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8370036: TestJhsdbJstackWithVirtualThread.java fails when run with -showversion Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8370036: TestJhsdbJstackWithVirtualThread.java fails when run with -showversion Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8370036: TestJhsdbJstackWithVirtualThread.java fails when run with -showversion Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8370036: TestJhsdbJstackWithVirtualThread.java fails when run with -showversion Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8370036: TestJhsdbJstackWithVirtualThread.java fails when run with -showversion Patricio Chilano Mateo
• RFR: 8245234: Still seeing missing mixed stack traces, even after JDK-8234624 Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Integrated: 8245234: Still seeing missing mixed stack traces, even after JDK-8234624 Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8245234: Still seeing missing mixed stack traces, even after JDK-8234624 Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8245234: Still seeing missing mixed stack traces, even after JDK-8234624 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8245234: Still seeing missing mixed stack traces, even after JDK-8234624 Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime Jonas Norlinder
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Jonas Norlinder
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Jonas Norlinder
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Jonas Norlinder
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Jonas Norlinder
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Jonas Norlinder
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Ivan Walulya
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Withdrawn: 8369449: Spec: introduce new JVMTI function GetTotalGCCpuTime Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8369482: JVMTI + Loom: JDK-8368159 introduced safepoint poll in disallowed state [v2] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8369482: JVMTI + Loom: JDK-8368159 introduced safepoint poll in disallowed state [v2] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8369482: JVMTI + Loom: JDK-8368159 introduced safepoint poll in disallowed state [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
• Integrated: 8348844: Remove remaining JVMTI tests from ProblemList-Virtual, use requires instead Leonid Mesnik
• RFR: 8369997: Tests that use custom scheduler should use jdk.test.lib.thread.VThreadScheduler Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8369997: Tests that use custom scheduler should use jdk.test.lib.thread.VThreadScheduler Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8369997: Tests that use custom scheduler should use jdk.test.lib.thread.VThreadScheduler Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8369997: Tests that use custom scheduler should use jdk.test.lib.thread.VThreadScheduler Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8369997: Tests that use custom scheduler should use jdk.test.lib.thread.VThreadScheduler Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v3] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v3] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v3] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Integrated: 8370071: Clarify jcmd Thread.print help message Sean Coffey
• RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal Kerem Kat
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v2] Kerem Kat
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v2] Kerem Kat
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v3] Kerem Kat
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v4] Kerem Kat
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v4] Kerem Kat
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v5] Kerem Kat
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v6] Kerem Kat
  • Re: RFR: 8351194: Clean up Hotspot SA after 32-bit x86 removal [v6] Chris Plummer

• Earlier messages
• Later messages