serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v7] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Integrated: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
• Integrated: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid [v4] Larry Cable
  • Re: RFR: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid [v4] Larry Cable
  • Re: RFR: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid [v4] Larry Cable
  • Re: RFR: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid [v4] duke
• Integrated: 8343344: Windows attach logic failed to handle a failed open on a pipe Alex Menkov
• Integrated: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager Sean Mullan
• Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v11] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v11] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v11] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v11] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v11] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v11] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v11] Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v10] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v10] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v10] Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v4] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v5] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v6] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v7] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v7] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v7] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v8] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow [v8] Per Minborg
  • Integrated: 8343984: Fix Unsafe address overflow Shaojin Wen
• Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v3] Y . Srinivas Ramakrishna
• RFR: 8343936: Adjust timeout in test javax/management/monitor/DerivedGaugeMonitorTest.java Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8343936: Adjust timeout in test javax/management/monitor/DerivedGaugeMonitorTest.java Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343936: Adjust timeout in test javax/management/monitor/DerivedGaugeMonitorTest.java [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8343936: Adjust timeout in test javax/management/monitor/DerivedGaugeMonitorTest.java [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8343936: Adjust timeout in test javax/management/monitor/DerivedGaugeMonitorTest.java [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343936: Adjust timeout in test javax/management/monitor/DerivedGaugeMonitorTest.java [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8343936: Adjust timeout in test javax/management/monitor/DerivedGaugeMonitorTest.java Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8343894: ProblemList javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8343894: ProblemList javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343894: ProblemList javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8343894: ProblemList javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java David Holmes
• Re: RFR: 8336691: Test LongArgTest.java intermittent fails java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: jdk/test/lib/Utils [v2] SendaoYan
• Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v6] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v6] Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v10] Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Yudi Zheng
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v19] Emanuel Peter
• Integrated: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) Roman Kennke
• RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Integrated: 8343781: Add since checker test to the Serviceability area modules Nizar Benalla
• Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v9] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v9] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v9] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v5] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v5] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v5] Alexander Matveev
• Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v33] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v33] Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v33] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v33] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v33] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v33] Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v33] Thomas Stuefe
• Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v32] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v9] Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8341436: containers/docker/TestJcmdWithSideCar.java takes needlessly long to run [v3] Sebastian Lövdahl
  • Re: RFR: 8341436: containers/docker/TestJcmdWithSideCar.java takes needlessly long to run [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8341436: containers/docker/TestJcmdWithSideCar.java takes needlessly long to run [v3] Sebastian Lövdahl
  • Re: RFR: 8341436: containers/docker/TestJcmdWithSideCar.java takes needlessly long to run [v3] Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8272780: ServerNotifForwarder.removeNotificationListener() incorrect exception handling Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8272780: ServerNotifForwarder.removeNotificationListener() incorrect exception handling David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8272780: ServerNotifForwarder.removeNotificationListener() incorrect exception handling Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8272780: ServerNotifForwarder.removeNotificationListener() incorrect exception handling Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Paul Hohensee
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v57] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v56] Roman Kennke
• RFR: 8343730: JMX cleanups Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8343730: JMX cleanups Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343730: JMX cleanups Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8343730: JMX cleanups Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Patricio Chilano Mateo

• Earlier messages
• Later messages