All,
I am running into problems when deploying the msp patch
files. Everything compiles properly and the msp is successfully
created. However, dlls that have changed are not installed when the msp patch
is applied. Below is the output generated by MsiMsp and it looks to be
including
ClickThrough generated a wix file with several errors. i
was able to repair the errors and run the resulting MSI but i didn't install
under the User context. all the test installs i have created have all worked
under Admin (as expected).
i have tested with DisableUserInstalls = 0 and also d
Don Tasanasanta wrote:
this is the install log that i'm
getting from your example code.
Does ClickThrough generate an MSI that installs for you? What's the
value of
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Installer\DisableUserInstalls?
--
sig://boB
http://bobs.org
FYI, WiX v3 has an called
CloseApplications that does just that.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Watkins, Jon
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 6:42
AM
To: '???';
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Uninstall
a system tray program --
Oh man, that's hilarious. Unfortunately, it was long enough ago that I can't remember the product that it tried to uninstall.-FrancisOn 6/16/06,
Rob Hamflett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:After a lot of testing and talking to ATI, it seems the problem is that the ATI uninstaller is
indiscriminately r
Package/@InstallerVersion
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:53 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] ERROR_INSTALL_PACKAGE_VERSION
I'm not seeing this in any of the X
100. By default the WiX toolset assumes you want to have the farthest reach
possible... all the way back to the very first version of the Windows
Installer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Foster,
Richard - PAL
Sent: Friday, June 16, 200
Just out of curiosity... What is the default for this. I assume at least
200, but has it now been updated to 300?
Regards,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
Simoneau
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 14:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wix
this is the install log that i'm getting from your
example code.
the actual popup window i get says:
"The system administrator has set policies to prevent this
installation."
__
Don Tasanasanta
VIACK Corporation
425-605-7423
From: Bob Arnson [mailto:[EMAIL
The InstallerVersion attribute of the Package element.
-Brian Simoneau
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:53 PM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] ERROR_INSTALL_PACKAGE
I'm not seeing this in any of the XML files I created...which attribute/node
am I looking for?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Wilson
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 10:32 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] ER
We use the Help Integration Wizard that's part of VS 2005 SDK. Might be worth a look.-FrancisOn 6/13/06, Kalappa Pattar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Yes,
I was talking about Help 2.0 Hxs files.
I implemented the functionality by modifying
MSHelp2_RegTables__RT
You need to modify the sources file for the
ConfigureSql custom action. It’s in sca.wxs – sorry, you’re
modifying sca.wixlib.
Derek
From: Scott Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:21
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
I didn’t see it anywhere in the
wixca.wxs file. What sources files do I need to edit?
From: Derek Cicerone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:38
PM
To: Scott Sam;
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [WiX-users] Another
Sequencing issue
That’
That’s way too soon to take a
dependency upon WiX 3.0. You’ll have to manually modify the sources
of wixca.wixlib to move ConfigureSql to a later sequence number so you can fit
your custom action in-between.
Derek
From: Scott Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, Jun
Next early next month.
From: Derek Cicerone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 12:38
PM
To: Scott Sam;
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [WiX-users] Another
Sequencing issue
In 2.0 you’ll need to manually
change the wixlibs to change the sequ
In 2.0 you’ll need to manually
change the wixlibs to change the sequencing. It’s very inconvenient
and a little risky. This was one of the first issues (if not the first)
tackled when I worked on 3.0. In 3.0 the sequencer is much more
intelligent about squeezing actions between others an
2.0
From: Derek Cicerone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:49
AM
To: Scott Sam; wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [WiX-users] Another
Sequencing issue
Are you using WiX 2.0 or 3.0?
I’m pretty sure this should work in 3.0 but probably not
Are you using WiX 2.0 or 3.0? I’m
pretty sure this should work in 3.0 but probably not 2.0.
Derek
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Sam
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 8:41
AM
To:
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [WiX-users] Another
Se
I have a custom action that runs and
executable, called dbinstallation.exe, which is installed in the
installation. The executable updates/creates the databases our software
uses. Dbinstallation reads an xml file the is created with the SchedXmlFile
action. In the installation we also in
We do product line development also ( but not localized due to the industry that I'm in ) and while considerations do feed into how we componentize, arrange and build the projects do result of this, I think of that as product line, build automation and source control issues more then I do windows
DifxApp functionality was removed from the native wix schema and put into an
extension - WixDifxAppExtension. To fix your authoring, you can do the
following:
1. Run "wixcop -f *.wxs" to fix your sources files for the new schema (this
will also modify whitespace so be sure to backup your sources b
This typically means that schema of the MSI file (such as 200 for MSI 2.0)
is higher than the current version of MSI on the system.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 7:45 AM
To: wix-users@
There’s actually quite a bit that
can be done in designing how a wix setup is organized and integrated with a
build process. It becomes particularly interesting for groups which ship 40
languages times a hundred or so SKUs (you can guess who these groups might be)
because the amount of aut
Hi All,
I can't seem to use DiFx to install device drivers with WiX 3.0.1703.0 in the
same way that I could with WiX 3.0.1319.0. I realise the syntax has changed so
that there is supposed to be a separate "Driver" element rather just attributes
of the "Component" element. I get the error "CND
Hello,
I tried to re-create my install set for an app I
haven’t touched in a few months. However, I get this error when I
start my MSI:
Windows Installer Error 1613
This installation package cannot be installed by the Windows
Installer service. You must install a Windows service p
Ed Russell wrote:
They are just normal files... The CA is linking to a database that has
been copied during install and performing some updates; I've tried
putting it after InstallFiles but it seems to be doing it in some patch
phase rather than after the files have actually been copied whic
dangle123 ... wrote:
>
> The reason I wanted to create and execute an immediate custom action
> is because on uninstall I want to remove all files not created by the
> installer package in a folder created by the installer package. This
> way the standard action "RemoveFolders" can remove the f
It sounds like our application is complaining
because it's removed with out shutting down. You might try creating a custom
action DLL to shut down / exit the systems tray application from a custom action
during the uninstall before the files are removed. -Jon
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTE
I thought of that myself but since Joseph said he wants the `design` reviewed before it went to a remote team for implementation I'm not sure there would be an MSI output to inspect. `Design` for installers is interesting eitherway. WindowsInstaller has so many patterns built into it that I'
I don't see any problems with this; most of our
environments are running VS 2005 or is a Windows 2003 Server as compileserver,
on which .NET 2.0 is installed for various uses.
And i suppose you should think about future development
possibilities in new environments such as .NET 2.0 whenever
Hi there,
They are just normal files... The CA is linking to a database that has
been copied during install and performing some updates; I've tried
putting it after InstallFiles but it seems to be doing it in some patch
phase rather than after the files have actually been copied which
confused me
I've been told they're implementing a fix, so future versions should be better
behaved.
Rob
Dave Williamson wrote:
> Wow! What in the world kind of logic is that!
>
> Very good to know.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
You may try looking for a MSI consultant,
in general. They should, at least, be able to inspect the output MSI.
Frederik.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Barkley
Sent: woensdag 14 juni 2006 23:39
To:
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Su
I have an app stay in the system tray when it is
minimized.But when it is
minimized it can be uninstall by the windows installer without any warning
message. And the app.exe is deleted while the app is still
running.However,when the app exit,it encounter an memory error! Has u guys
encounte
Wow! What in the world kind of logic is that!
Very good to know.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hamflett
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 4:10 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Product clashes
After
After a lot of testing and talking to ATI, it seems the problem is that the ATI
uninstaller is
indiscriminately removing any product with the uppercase letters 'ATI' in it's
name. Does this
sound like the cause of your past problem?
Rob
Francis Kam wrote:
> I don't have the answer, but I can
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:21:13 -0700, dangle123 ... wrote:
Leo,
> custom action. If the "RemoveFolders" action sees that there are
> files in a folder that was not created by the installer package it
> will not remove the folder...
You also have RemoveFile at your disposal...
Bye,
Gábor
---
The reason I wanted to create and execute an immediate custom action is because on uninstall I want to remove all files not created by the installer package in a folder created by the installer package. This way the standard action "RemoveFolders" can remove the folder that the installer created
39 matches
Mail list logo
